Good University Governance: Tata Kelola Universitas yang Baik

Meidy Santje Selvy Kantohe

Good University Governance: Tata Kelola Universitas yang Baik

Authors

Meidy Santje Selvy Kantohe

Universitas Negeri Manado

Keywords:

Good, University, Governance, Tata kelola, Universitas

Synopsis

Buku ini mengupas tuntas pentingnya tata kelola yang baik (Good University Governance-GUG) dalam perguruan tinggi. GUG menjadi kunci untuk memerangi korupsi yang marak terjadi dan meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan. Dibuka dengan paparan tentang bahaya korupsi di perguruan tinggi dan bagaimana GUG dapat menjadi solusi pencegahannya, buku ini kemudian mendalami teori keagenan dalam konteks tata kelola sektor publik. Pembaca diajak memahami pengertian, lingkup, dan nilai-nilai dasar GUG di Indonesia, termasuk kepemimpinan, etika, transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan komitmen. Lebih lanjut, dibahas pula ruang lingkup universitas, perbedaan antara Corporate Governance dan University Governance, serta prinsip-prinsip GUG yang esensial. GUG diuraikan sebagai fondasi untuk menciptakan mutu perguruan tinggi yang unggul. Studi kasus penerapan GUG di beberapa perguruan tinggi turut dihadirkan, memberikan contoh nyata penerapan konsep ini. Buku ini diakhiri dengan pembahasan tentang pengendalian internal dan komitmen perguruan tinggi dalam mewujudkan GUG.

Editor : Jolanda Esther Kaihatu, Cahyadi Nugroho

Huruf dan Ukuran :
Constantia (11), x + 72 , Uk: UNESCO (15,5 x 23 cm)

ISBN :
978-623-89335-1-8

Cetakan Pertama :
Agustus, 2024

Katalog dalam Terbitan (KDT)
Good university governance: tata kelola universitas yang baik/ Dr. Meidy Santje Selvy Kantohe, M.Si,; editor, Dr. Jolanda Esther Kaihatu, M.Si, Dr. Cahyadi Nugroho, S.Pd., M.Pd/Jurusan Pendidikan Geografi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Manado, 2024.

Hak Cipta 2024, Pada Penulis

Harga Buku: Rp.74.000,-

References

Ashraf, J., & Uddin, S. (2015). Military, managers and hegemonies of management accounting controls; A critical realist interpretation. Management Accounting Research, 29, 13–26.

Bensimon, E. M. (1989). The meaning of good presidential leadership : a frame analysis. Review of Higher Education, 12(107), 23.

Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & Goodin, R. E. (2014). Public accountability (The Oxford). Oxford USA: Oxford University Press.

Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Albert A. Cannella, J. (2003). Corporate Governance : Decades of Dialogue and Data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196703

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service revisited. Public Administration Review, Wiley Online Library, 75(5), 664–672.

Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service revisited: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, Wiley Online Library, 60(6), 549–559.

Egi. (2016). Korupsi di Perguruan Tinggi. Retrieved February 12, 2022, from https://antikorupsi.org/id/article/korupsi-di-perguruan-tinggi

Ginkel, V. H. (2006). Responsibilities, Callenges, Opportunities and Governance Rethinking The University For The 21st century. United Nation University.

Haque, M. S. (2002). The Diminishing Publicness of Public Service under the Current Mode of Governance. Public Administration Review, 61(1), 65–82.

Henard, F., & Mitterle, A. Governance and Quality Guidlines in Higher Education (2010). OECD.

Institute of Internal Auditors. Supplementary Guidance : The Role of Auditing in Public Sector Governance (2012).

Jackson, J., & Cowley, J. (2003). Blinking dons or donning blinkers: fiduciary and common law obligations of members of governing boards of Australian universities. Brisbane.

Jacob, W. J., & Rust, V. D. (2010). Priciples of Good Governance: A Review of Key Themes Identified at the 7th International Workshop on Higher Education Reform. Comparative & International Higher Education. Institute for International Studies in Education, University of Pittsburgh, USA and Center for International & Development Education, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.

KNKG. (2022). Pedoman Umum Governansi Sektor Publik Indonesia (PUG-SPI). Jakarta: Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance (KNKG).

Lombardi, J. L., craig, D. D., Capaldi, E. D., & Gater, D. S. (2002). The Center Organization, Governance, and Competitiveness.

Mardiasmo. (2009). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogjakarta: Andi.

Mardiasmo. (2018). Akuntansi Sektor Publik (Edisi terb). Yogyakarta: Andi.

Noor, A. (2008). Ethics, Religion and Good Governance. JOAAG, 3(2).

Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic action: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. (L. . Cummings & B. M. Staw, Eds.). Greenwich: JAI Press.

Pierce JR, J. R. (1989). The Role of the Judiciary in Implementing an Agency Theory of Government. HEINONLINE, 64, 1239.

Pusser, B., & Ordorika, I. (2001). Bringing political theory to university governance: the University of California and the Unversidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.

Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. J. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the Challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47(3), 227–238.

Rosnidah, I., Setiawan, A., Mahadianto, M. Y., & WN, M. P. (2014). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit Internal Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Tinggi dengan Tata Kelola Universitas Yang Baik sebagai Variabel Intervensi (Studi Pada Universitas di Wilayah III Cirebon Jawa Barat). In SNEB (pp. 1–7). Cirebon Jawa Barat.

Shapiro, P. S. (2005). Agency Theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 263–284.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2019). People, Power and Profits; Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent.

Stroup, H. H. (1966). Bureaucracy in higher education. New York: Free Press.

Sujana, I Wajan, Widnyana, I. W., & Suparsa, I. N. (2017). Peran Auditor Internal Dalam Menentukan Pengaruh Pengendalian Intern Terhadap Good University Governance di Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar. Jurnal Bakti Saraswati, 06(01), 63–72.

Sujana, I Wayan, Widnyana, I. W., & Suparsa, I. N. (2017). Peran Auditor Internal Dalam Menentukan Pengaruh Pengendalian Intern Terhadap Good University Governance di Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar. Jurnal Bakti Saraswati, 06(01), 63–72.

Tricker, R. I. ., & Tricker, R. . (2015). Corporate Governance : Principles, Policies, and Practices (Third Edit). Oxford USA: Oxford University Press.

Turnbull, S. (2002). Corporate Governance: Its scope, concern and theories. Wiley Online Library, 5(4), 180–205.

Uddin, S. (2009). Rationalities, domination and accounting control; A case study from a traditional society. Critical Perspective on Accounting, 20(6), 782–794.

UNDP. (2011). Eight governance principles, institutional capacity, and quality. New York, USA.

Walsh, P. J., & Seward, K. J. (1990). On the Efficiency of Internal and External Corporate Control Mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 15(3).

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Wibowo, K. S. (2022, January 25). Peringkat Korupsi Indonesia Buruk. Tempo.Co. Retrieved from deks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia 2021 Naik Satu Poin Jadi 38

Widjajanti, K., & Sugiyanto, E. K. (2015). Good University Governance Untuk Meningkatkan Exellent Service dan Kepercayaan Mahasiswa (Studi Kasus Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Semarang). Dinamika SosBud, 17(2), 69–81.

World Bank. (2017). World Development Report 2017: Governance and the Law. Washington, DC. USA.